
| May 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
My Big 12 preview
My espn.com archives
Most recent entries
BP is on line!
Moving On
What the heck is not going on here?
NST’s
The Orange Effect
Monthly Archives
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
Complete Archives
Category Archives
Blogging Superheroes
big ten wonk
The Mid-Majority
yoco:: College Basketball
Other College Hoops Blogs
Cracked Sidewalks
Hoop Time
UCLA Blog
Yet Another Basketball Blog
SEC Hoops
K-State Stats
CrossCyed
Chris West
Vandy Sabermetrics
Hoya Prospectus
The CAA: Life as a Mid-Major
The Bracket Board
Basketball Junkie
Villanova by the Numbers
The Courtmaster
Syndicate
Hits on this page: 2267820
Page rendered in 0.2516 seconds
Friday, March 09, 2007
No Rest, No Problem?
Several people, including myself, have noted that the log5 prediction formula doesn’t account for the situation of a fatigued team having to play a fresh team. It seems like a plausible idea, but looking at yesterday’s action, the jury’s still out.
The predictions below are based on yesterday’s ratings involving games where only one team had played the day before. And while only two wins were predicted for the fatigued bunch, we’d expect about five based on the sum of the win percentages. In aggregate, fatigued teams slightly underperformed, winning two or three fewer games than expected (although two of the fatigued winners were very unexpected). However, the average score wasn’t much different than expected.
I’ll update this for the 15 games that fall into this category today.
Fatigued Team Rested Team Pred Outcome Villanova Georgetown L,61-65(33%) L,57-62 Syracuse Notre Dame L,78-80(42%) L,83-89 West Virginia Louisville L,64-66(38%) L,71-82 2OT Marquette Pitt L,64-67(36%) L,79-89 Cal UCLA L,59-71(10%) W,76-69 OT Washington Washington St. L,63-67(34%) L,64-74 Dayton Xavier L,64-75(15%) L,51-72 Fordham Rhode Island W,69-68(52%) L,69-73 St. Louis UMass L,62-69(23%) W,74-71 OT St. Joseph's George Wash. L,63-65(44%) L,48-58 E. Michgan Toledo L,62-72(16%) L,54-62 Ohio Miami L,60-61(44%) L,51-70 C. Michigan Akron L,60-75( 5%) L,53-82 W. Michigan Kent St. L,65-69(34%) L,66-75 Rice Central Fla. L,61-79( 5%) W,53-51 Southern Miss Houston L,68-70(43%) L,59-62 Marshall Memphis L,58-82( 2%) L,71-92 Tulsa Tulane W,69-66(64%) L,56-58 Wins 5.4 3 Avg Score 64-70 63-71
