Most recent entries

  • Your 2016 kPOY: Brice Johnson
  • Spiking the football on the 30-second shot clock
  • Sweet 16 probabilities
  • Need scheduling help?
  • 2016 NCAA tournament log5
  • 2016 Big West tournament preview
  • 2016 WAC tournament preview
  • 2016 Sun Belt tournament preview
  • 2016 American tournament preview
  • 2016 Big Ten tournament preview
  • The good stuff

    At other venues...
  • ($)
  • Deadspin
  • Slate

  • Strategy
  • Whether to foul up 3 late
  • The value of 2-for-1’s
  • Whether to foul when tied (1, 2, 3)
  • Who's the best in-game coach?

  • Philosophy
  • All points are not created equal
  • Brady Heslip’s non-slump
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • A treatise on plus-minus
  • The preseason AP poll is great
  • The lack of information in close-game performance
  • Why I don’t believe in clutchness*

  • Fun stuff
  • The missing 1-point games
  • Which two teams last lost longest ago?
  • How many first-round picks will Kentucky have?
  • Prepare for the Kobe invasion
  • Predicting John Henson's free throw percentage
  • Can Derrick Williams set the three-point accuracy record?
  • Play-by-play Theater: earliest disqualification
  • Monthly Archives

  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003

  • RSS feed

    Why isn’t Ron Baker getting the Dominic Artis treatment?

    by Ken Pomeroy on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

    Explaining the game-to-game variation in a team’s performance is difficult. Sometimes, a team’s star player just plays well, or the opposing team plays more poorly than usual, or a team avoids foul trouble, or most of the dozen or so 50/50 calls go a particular team’s way. These explanations are uninteresting and not satisfactory, though, and so observers must come up with more meaningful explanations whether they are real or not. Be it a famous alum giving a pep talk before the game, a team focusing on starting the game better, or an injured player returning to the lineup.

    Evaluating the impact of of a player’s injury is perhaps something that highly-trained humans can do better than computers. Not that computers can’t help in this regard, but it’s a complex problem, which is why I’ve been disappointed in the approach to this sort of analysis in some cases this season. Maybe it just seems like it started this season, but instead of critically evaluating how a player’s absence affects a team, the experts now just look at a team’s record with and without that player on the floor.

    There’s some value to this, of course, but given the varying quality of opposition a team faces during the season, looking simply at W’s and L’s is not the most robust approach. Besides, this is something a computer can do as well as a human. Humans are selling themselves short if this is their method of choice.

    This approach first came to my attention when Miami beat Duke by 27 on January 23. They had lost to Florida Gulf Coast in November when Durand Scott was serving a suspension. They lost to Arizona and Indiana State without Reggie Johnson. But after the Duke win, it was frequently noted that the Hurricanes hadn’t loss with both players available. Keep in mind that at that point, Miami had played just six games with a full contingent which is a frighteningly small amount of data from which to draw conclusions. But that didn’t stop people from declaring that Miami could be one of the best teams in the nation and that any games played without Johnson or Scott should be ignored.

    (It’s an interesting twist that Miami’s breakthrough win over Duke occurred without Ryan Kelly in Duke’s lineup. Upon Kelly’s return in February, he was given similar status to Reggie Johnson. All of Duke’s games without Kelly, including that lopsided Miami loss, were suddenly stricken from the record. The conclusion was that the Blue Devils were unbeatable with Kelly in the lineup.)

    It figures that Reggie Johnson’s availability helps Miami, but given that he’s played no more than 24 minutes in any game since his return, one should be skeptical whether his presence alone lifts Miami from a middle-of-the-pack ACC team to a national title contender, especially considering Johnson’s 88 offensive rating this season. Perhaps the losses without him in the lineup are data points that should be discounted, but they shouldn’t be completely ignored. As the ACC season continued, we saw Miami play very well at times, and somewhat less inspiring at other times.

    This concept continued with similarly fuzzy logic when evaluating Oregon. The Ducks struggled big-time in February, going from 7-0 in conference play to 12-6. The low-point came in lopsided losses to Colorado and Utah in the final two games of the regular season, when the Ducks controlled their own destiny for a solo regular-season Pac-12 title.

    At that point, there was the natural urge to explain the difference in play between late-season Oregon and early-season Oregon. That was largely done using the Ducks’ freshman point guard Dominic Artis, who played a somewhat prominent role in the Oregon offense as the Ducks jumped out to a 17-2 record. Artis injured his foot and missed the Ducks next nine games, where Oregon compiled a 5-4 record as Johnathan Loyd took on most of Artis’s vacated minutes. Artis has played the Ducks’ last eight games and Oregon has gone 6-2. And they’ve been dominant in their two NCAA tournament games, fueling the argument that Oregon is somehow historically-underseeded based on their performance at full strength.

    Nevermind that Artis has averaged just 17 minutes a game since his return, and hasn’t really been the same player he was in November and December. He’s made 24 percent of his twos, 32 percent of his 3’s and has been to the free throw line a total of seven times since coming back. In Oregon’s overtime win over Washington in the Pac-12 quarterfinals, with the Ducks tournament hopes possibly hanging in the balance, he didn’t even play in overtime. He was also in the lineup for the disappointing losses to Colorado and Utah. Attributing all or even most of Oregon’s stunning improvement in the tournament to his presence is misguided.

    The response to such logic is that Artis brings intangibles to the table. No doubt intangibles exist, but it’s also the knee-jerk rebuttal to any statistical argument. In this case, the lack of tangibles weakens the position that the Ducks are different with Artis. You could more easily point to the improved play of Loyd himself, or Carlos Emory, and Oregon’s incredible run defensively since the Pac-12 semifinals to explain Oregon’s improvement in the tournament. For whatever reason, Oregon’s last 80 minutes have been their best of the season, but Artis’s presence has little to do with it.

    Finally, let’s take a blind look at three guys that made a late return to teams that are still alive.

           with  w/o  G* MPG* 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A
    A      23-4  5-4  8   17  5-21  6-19  5-7
    B      13-2 15-6  5   24  6-8   9-24 12-14
    C      20-1  9-4  6   30 15-28  9-26 22-26 

    *Since returning to the lineup
    You might guess that A is Artis since I’ve revealed his statistics previously. C is Kelly, whose impact has also been overstated. Kelly does mean a lot to Duke, but he doesn’t make them unbeatable as was suggested after his 39-point game against Miami. His offensive numbers have been decidedly less spectacular since then. He hasn’t hit a three-pointer in the ACC or NCAA tournaments and scored a single point against Creighton. (To his credit, he was mostly responsible for Doug McDermott’s somewhat-inefficient 21-point game).

    Player B is Wichita State’s Ron Baker, who most recently put up a 16-point game against a Gonzaga team oddly willing to let him put his marksmanship on display. Baker’s presence is obviously not as important as Malcolm Armstead or Carl Hall or Cleanthony Early, and I’m not saying Baker turns the Shockers into a Final Four team. But if Wichita State gets there, Baker’s return will have played a role. It’s not hard to make the case it’s a larger role than Artis’s, yet Baker’s return has received approximately zero fanfare.

    I expect the discrepancy has more to do with groupthink than anything. Oregon was in the national spotlight, stumbled in the middle of Pac-12 play, and Artis was a good enough reason to attribute to those losses. Oregon was surely going to lose some Pac-12 games anyway, though, just as Duke would have lost some of their ACC road games if Ryan Kelly had played in them. But people need some explanation as to why Oregon has looked so good in the tournament when they struggled so much at the end of the regular season.

    Despite the 9-0 start to its season, Wichita State barely cracked the AP top 25, and was promptly demoted after a road loss to Tennessee. Many fewer people have been interested in their situation than Oregon’s. However, the Shockers have also dramatically improved their play in the tournament and in their case, it’s a bit more factual to attribute part of this improvement to a late change in personnel.