CourtIntelligence powered by

The good stuff

At other venues...
  • ($)
  • Deadspin
  • Slate

  • Strategy
  • Whether to foul up 3 late
  • The value of 2-for-1’s

  • Philosophy
  • Brady Heslip’s non-slump
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • A treatise on plus-minus
  • The preseason AP poll is great
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • The lack of information in close-game performance
  • Why I don’t believe in clutchness*

  • Fun stuff
  • The missing 1-point games
  • Which two teams last lost longest ago?
  • How many first-round picks will Kentucky have?
  • Prepare for the Kobe invasion
  • Predicting John Henson's free throw percentage
  • Can Derrick Williams set the three-point accuracy record?
  • Play-by-play Theater: earliest disqualification
  • Monthly Archives

  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003

  • RSS feed

    Our brave new world

    by Ken Pomeroy on Wednesday, November 27, 2013

    Over the past few days, lower scores have been appearing more frequently on the national scoreboard. Are officials heeding some sort of dictum issued by the secret society of coaches, led by Tom Izzo? We can get a better idea by taking a closer look at the data. We can’t know about the secret society until we discover John Adams working at an East Lansing Chevron in March. But we can find some useful information in comparing the early trends this season with those of recent seasons.

    For those suspecting that officials are cowering in the face of (very limited) criticism, you might cite the decreasing foul rate over the first two weeks of the season. However, foul rate always drops early in the season. The graph below shows how this season’s decrease compares to the drop over the past five seasons, using the daily average of all D-I vs. D-I games played on a particular day. Based on the similar trends, you might chalk up any adjustments being made this season as similar to whatever adjustments have been made in the past and not something unique to the current rules interpretations.

    The season-long plot on the bottom tells us that in the past, some sort of equilibrium was reached right about finals week, and free throw rate remains constant after that, with a slight rise as the pressure of championship week approaches. Who knows how it will play out this season, but it seems clear that in a macro sense we’ve seen the worst of the whistles this season.

    Changes in more fundamental aspects of the game are also consistent with previous seasons. Average tempo is gradually decreasing. Tuesday’s 68 D-I vs. D-I games featured an average tempo of 66.8 possessions per 40 minutes, the slowest-paced day of the season so far, and reminiscent of a typical day last season. But based on past seasons, tempo decreases markedly early in the season, and once the day-to-day noise is filtered out, the trend we’ve seen so far this season is no different than that found in recent seasons. If the trend continues to mirror previous seasons, this decline in tempo will persist well into February.

    So Izzo’s right when he claims that games will get slower as the season progresses. But they always do. This will hardly be proof that the new interpretations are a bad idea.

    Opposing the decrease in pace is an increase in efficiency. While average efficiency is up over last season, the day-to-day trend is nearly identical to an average of the five previous seasons. In the past, efficiency continues to increase throughout the season although the rate of increase becomes flatter with time. On Monday, teams scored an average of 1.071 points per possession, the second-highest daily mark of the season. Those kinds of days may not become the norm, but they may happen more regularly going forward.

    In most ways, trends are matching what has occurred in the past, but there’s at least one area where they’re not. Turnover rate started the season at stunningly low levels. There hasn’t been a single day so far where teams have collectively committed turnovers on at least 19 percent of possessions. There hasn’t been a season over the last decade where the average has been below 20, so clearly something is different in this area. The past five seasons have provided a consistent signal where turnover rate decreases over the course of the season. But this season, the opposite may be occurring. The normal mechanism for the increased in efficiency is a rise in shooting coupled with better ball security. With the latter potentially moving in the opposite direction, efficiency may not show its usual rise the rest of the season.

    If the difference in the trend of turnover rate is real, it tells me that defenses are adjusting to the new rules interpretations, and not necessarily in the way that coaches like Izzo and Larry Eustachy fear. We may be on the path to a more free-flowing game, with more scoring and a less drastic drop in turnover rate than it looks based on the early data. Sure, there will be a few more fouls called, but we’ll see fewer players in foul trouble as the season continues, as was the case in previous seasons.

    One other constant between this season and previous is that coaches, players, media, and fans will complain about the officiating. If the officials hadn’t changed their approach, we would have heard how college basketball is the roughest form of the sport played anywhere on the planet. So frankly, I’d prefer to evaluate this new era of hoops using data rather than comments from coaches, even those as respected as Tom Izzo.