Subscribe!
CourtIntelligence powered by kenpom.com

Most recent entries

  • Weeks in Review III, 12/5-12/18
  • Introduction to the PASR recruiting model
  • On unbalanced conference schedules
  • Play-by-Play Theater: Quickest individual 3’s
  • Weeks in Review II, 11/22-12/4
  • The ACC/Big Ten Challenge bar chart
  • Week in Review I, 11/14-11/21
  • The slowest season(?)
  • What I did this summer
  • The first annual #ShootersClub
  • The good stuff


    At other venues...
  • ESPN.com ($)
  • Deadspin
  • Slate

  • Strategy
  • Whether to foul up 3 late
  • The value of 2-for-1’s

  • Philosophy
  • Brady Heslip’s non-slump
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • A treatise on plus-minus
  • The preseason AP poll is great
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • The lack of information in close-game performance
  • Why I don’t believe in clutchness*

  • Fun stuff
  • The missing 1-point games
  • Which two teams last lost longest ago?
  • How many first-round picks will Kentucky have?
  • Prepare for the Kobe invasion
  • Predicting John Henson's free throw percentage
  • Can Derrick Williams set the three-point accuracy record?
  • Play-by-play Theater: earliest disqualification
  • Monthly Archives

  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003

  • RSS feed

    A night of Gonzaga basketball

    by Ken Pomeroy on Friday, March 1, 2013


    I don’t know whether Gonzaga’s going to get a one-seed. Should they get a one, there will be a lot of reasons given as to why they won’t be able to win six games in a row in the tournament. Of course, 67 of 68 teams will eventually lose in the tournament, so anyone taking a contrary opinion on Gonzaga will ultimately look pretty smart. In fact, unless you’re a strong one-seed in a given year, the chances of even getting to the Final Four are against you.  So go ahead and pick against the Zags. It’s the safe bet, even though this may be the best team Mark Few has coached. They’ll almost surely lose at some point.

    Taking a more analytical approach, there were a few impressions I left with from last night’s game at BYU. First, Gonzaga not only possesses the rare trait of having front court depth, but they have guys that can expose the opposing team’s lack of it. BYU’s Brandon Davies got in early foul trouble and Bronson Kaufusi fouled out in ten minutes. OK, Kaufusi was trying to foul people, but presumably Davies, a reasonably skilled offensive player, was not.

    Not only is Gonzaga deep up front, but between Kelly Olynyk (draws 6.2 fouls per 40 minutes), Przemek Karnowski (5.7), and Elias Harris (6.5) they have players that draw fouls in abundance. So the Bulldogs can sustain foul trouble better than most and they’ll often hurt you if you don’t have depth up front. Dave Rose got creative with offense/defense substituions to squeeze 29 minutes out of Brandon Davies despite two early fouls. Rose’s tricks are something future opponents might want to research because they’re likely to face the issue themselves.

    The critics that will safely forecast Gonzaga’s season ending in a loss will point to how BYU’s zone encouraged the Zags to take 30 of their 56 field goal attempts from beyond the arc. Gonzaga doesn’t normally shoot a ton of threes, and it was the first time this season they’ve shot more threes than twos. Which might lead one to believe that Gonzaga will be see a lot of zone from now on. Here’s the thing, though: Kevin Pangos is a 40% career three-point shooter and he went one-for-12.

    And it’s not like most of those shots were contested as BYU played what I think was a new version of the box-and-one - with a box around Kelly Olynyk at all times. Pangos is as likely to go 7-for-12 and 1-for-12, and if he’d done the former the game would have gotten ugly. Gonzaga is one of the better outside shooting teams in the land and they went 6-for-30 on threes. Zone was the best option BYU had, but they still needed an off night from Gonzaga to have a chance to win. Even under that scenario, BYU never led.

    On a less analytical note, congrats are in order to Mike Hart. He played just enough minutes against BYU to put him over the 40% minutes played threshold, which has allowed him to take over the national lead in offensive rating at 160.3. The trick is that he takes a lower share of his team’s shots (4.8%) while he’s on the floor than all but one qualifying player in the land. He took one in 28 minutes last night. An opposing coach or two apparently loves him. One coach makes the point that Hart never commits turnovers. (No duh, he rarely touches the ball in the offense.) Another quote - “his weaknesses are obvious, but his strengths are invisible”. Is that really a compliment? But Hart is a pesky offensive rebounder and an above average defender. And there’s probably something to be said for just doing those things on a team that has three or four other capable scorers.

    Gonzaga didn’t look all that sharp against BYU, but also consider playing BYU on the road is like playing the winner of the 8/9 game on a neutral floor. If Gonzaga’s below-average effort is good enough to get by a round of 32 game without trailing at any point, that doesn’t disqualify them from one-seed worthiness. On the other hand, if you are under the impression that a one-seed’s failure to advance to the Final Four is proof of that team being undeserving of such a seed, you are likely to be vindicated in the case of Gonzaga, or whichever team gets a one-seed in two weeks.