{"id":525,"date":"2011-01-03T11:51:07","date_gmt":"2011-01-03T17:51:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/67.227.157.91\/~kenpom\/wp_blog\/preconference-preview-blowout-part-1\/"},"modified":"2011-01-03T11:51:07","modified_gmt":"2011-01-03T17:51:07","slug":"preconference-preview-blowout-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/preconference-preview-blowout-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Pre&#45;conference preview blowout: part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As each conference gets started with games by Saturday, it\u2019s a good time to look at who is likely to win each of the 32 D-I leagues. I\u2019ve run the season 10,000 times using the current ratings and then recorded how many times each team finished at the top of its conference. If teams shared the top spot, I gave them the appropriate fraction for that trial. (Because of these fractions and the rounding I do at the end, totals for each conference may not add up to exactly 10,000. Also, some teams can be listed as having zero titles because they were involved in a single multi-team tie for the top spot.)<\/p>\n<p>The count listed for the favorite is going to be somewhat inflated since it assumes that the team\u2019s current rating will remain constant for the remainder of the season. But everyone\u2019s level of play is going to change, and it\u2019s more likely that one of the three or four contenders in each conference will improve than it is for the favorite itself to improve.<\/p>\n<p>What follows is the list of teams that won at least one simulation for each conference season. This is presented in order of least to most competitive races. This is Part 1. Part 2 will contain the more interesting races. <\/p>\n<p><b>32. ACC<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Duke                   9381 \nNorth Carolina          288\nFlorida St.             147\nMaryland                 96\nVirginia Tech            54\nBoston College           23\nClemson                   8\nMiami FL                  4\n<\/pre>\n<p>No surprise here, as Duke has basically lived up to early expectations and whoever was going to challenge Duke hasn\u2019t. <\/p>\n<p><b>31. Pac 10<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Washington             9122\nArizona                 672\nWashington St.           90\nSouthern California      82 \nUCLA                     30\nStanford                  2\nCalifornia                1\nOregon St.                0\n<\/pre>\n<p>Washington appears to be the best team in the league, and by virtue of escaping the SoCal road trip with a 2-0 record the Huskies significantly increased their chances of winning the conference. Then Arizona went and lost at Oregon State, nearly clinching it for the Huskies.<\/p>\n<p><b>30. WAC<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Utah St.               9052 \nBoise St.               901\nNew Mexico St.           32\nNevada                   12\nIdaho                     2\nFresno St.                0\n<\/pre>\n<p>I have to admit that I\u2019ve been thinking Boise State had a legit chance to steal the top seed in the WAC. Utah State has looked sluggish in winning its two WAC home games to start conference play. But apparently, it\u2019s a little early for Bronco fans to dream big.<\/p>\n<p><b>29. Atlantic Sun<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Belmont                9019\nLipscomb                468\nJacksonville            330\nEast Tennessee St.      163\nCampbell                 19\n<\/pre>\n<p>Belmont\u2019s three losses have included competitive defeats at Tennessee (twice) and at Vanderbilt. They&#8217;ve mostly taken care of business in other games against weaker competition and sport a healthy 9% chance to run the A-Sun table, which is impressive considering it\u2019s a 20 game slate.<\/p>\n<p><b>28. Big Ten<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Ohio St.               8791 \nPurdue                  943\nIllinois                 98\nMichigan St.             94\nWisconsin                74 \nNorthwestern              0\n<\/pre>\n<p>While the Big Ten is more top-heavy that people give it credit for (at least, relative to the Big East), it is *really* top-heavy at the very top.<\/p>\n<p><b>27. Big 12<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Kansas                 8352\nTexas                   554\nBaylor                  416\nMissouri                342\nTexas A&amp;M               240\nKansas St.               53\nNebraska                 24\nIowa St.                 14\nOklahoma St.              5\nColorado                  0\n<\/pre>\n<p>Somewhat surprisingly, Nebraska has the seventh-best chance of gaining the top seed. The Huskers have yet to play a true road game, which in today\u2019s world is enough for analysts to disregard them. But you heard it here first &#8211; Nebraska will apply a \u201cbad loss\u201d to at least one team in the Big 12 hierarchy.<\/p>\n<p><b>26. Summit League<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Oakland                8247\nSouth Dakota St.        811\nIUPU Fort Wayne         416\nIUPUI                   251\nOral Roberts            217\nNorth Dakota St.         58\n<\/pre>\n<p>Most teams in the Summit have played four of their 18 conference games already. Oakland played a famously difficult non-conference schedule to start the season &#8211; it ranked 5th hardest in my system &#8211; but has had no problem starting 4-0 in conference.<\/p>\n<p><b>25. Southland<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Stephen F. Austin      8165\nSam Houston St.         989\nNicholls St.            731\nMcNeese St.              78\nTexas San Antonio        20\nLamar                     6\nTexas St.                 4 \nNorthwestern St.          3\nTexas Arlington           2\nSoutheastern Louisiana    2\nTexas A&amp;M Corpus Chris    1\n<\/pre>\n<p>The Southland has yet to play a conference game and so all kinds of possibilities exist. Most of them involve SFA and its nation-leading defensive turnover percentage winning the league.<\/p>\n<p><b>24. Big Sky<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Montana                7951 \nNorthern Colorado       871\nNorthern Arizona        810\nMontana St.             249\nWeber St.               115\nPortland St.              4\nEastern Washington        0\n<\/pre>\n<p>The Griz have the road win over UCLA which was widely assumed to be evidence that UCLA is no good this season. However, the Bruins have not been a pushover at home when healthy, so maybe we should give Montana a bit more respect.<\/p>\n<p><b>23. Horizon<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Butler                 7861\nCleveland St.          2085\nValparaiso               32\nWright St.               18\nLoyola Chicago            2\nDetroit                   1\n<\/pre>\n<p>This is the closest thing to a two-team race in the nation &#8211; only 53 simulations have a team other than Butler or Cleveland State winning the title and receiving the honor of hosting the conference tourney. Even with Cleveland State already having two more wins than Butler, the Dawgs are still a substantial favorite.<\/p>\n<p><b>22. Great West<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>South Dakota           7808 \nUtah Valley            1691 \nTexas Pan American      394\nNorth Dakota             73\nHouston Baptist          18\nNJ Inst of Technology    16\n<\/pre>\n<p>The GWC tournament is essentially meaningless since there is no auto-bid to the NCAA tournament on the line. But the regular-season champ does get a bid to the CIT.<\/p>\n<p><b>21. Big West<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Long Beach St.         7308\nUC Santa Barbara       1596\nPacific                 970\nUC Davis                 55\nUC Irvine                51\nCal St. Northridge        8\nCal St. Fullerton         7\nCal Poly                  5\n<\/pre>\n<p>Long Beach State has already beaten UCSB on the road. Thus, they\u2019ve assumed the clear favorite role.<\/p>\n<p><b>20. Big South<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Coastal Carolina       7165 \nCharleston Southern     872\nVirginia Military Inst  663 \nLiberty                 654\nWinthrop                473\nPresbyterian            138\nNC Asheville             33\nHigh Point                1\nGardner Webb              0\n<\/pre>\n<p>If Coastal stumbles, the conference is up for grabs. (Seriously, this is the only interesting thing I can say about the Big South.)<\/p>\n<p><b>19. SEC<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>Kentucky               6348 \nVanderbilt             2750\n\u2028Florida                 563\nMississippi             128\nAlabama                 109\nTennessee                62\nArkansas                 38\nGeorgia                   2\nSouth Carolina            0\n<\/pre>\n<p>This analysis assumes the best record gets the one-seed, even though the divisional structure essentially produces co-one seeds. Vandy has put itself in the position of being a plausible contrarian pick heading into conference play.<\/p>\n<p><b>18. Patriot<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>\nBucknell               6328\n\u2028American               2433\nLehigh                 1076\nHoly Cross               88\nLafayette                51\nArmy                     22\nNavy                      2<\/pre>\n<p>Bucknell boosted its profile nicely by beating Richmond on the road yesterday. <\/p>\n<p><b>17. WCC<\/b><\/p>\n<pre>St. Mary's             6099\n\u2028Gonzaga                3655\nPortland                234\nSanta Clara              11\nLoyola Marymount          1\n<\/pre>\n<p>I\u2019m not going to say I believe SMC should be the favorite to win the league, but pre-season hype aside, the Gaels have looked very good. Had <a href=\"http:\/\/kenpom.com\/winprob.php?g=5268\">this coin flip<\/a> gone the other way, a lot more people would be considering their chances to end Gonzaga\u2019s eight-year streak of winning the WCC outright.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As each conference gets started with games by Saturday, it\u2019s a good time to look at who is likely to win each of the 32 D-I leagues. I\u2019ve run the season 10,000 times using the current ratings and then recorded how many times each team finished at the top of its conference. If teams shared [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}