{"id":186,"date":"2014-03-17T01:03:31","date_gmt":"2014-03-17T07:03:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/67.227.157.91\/~kenpom\/wp_blog\/2014-ncaa-tournament-log5\/"},"modified":"2014-03-17T01:03:31","modified_gmt":"2014-03-17T07:03:31","slug":"2014-ncaa-tournament-log5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/2014-ncaa-tournament-log5\/","title":{"rendered":"2014 NCAA tournament log5"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What follows is the master log5 for the 68-team field. At the risk of being lumped in with Rick Reilly, I will recycle the disclaimers from last year:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; The calculations below represent the chance of each team advancing to a specific round based on the log5 formula and each team\u2019s pythagorean rating. Unfamiliar with log5? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chancesis.com\/2010\/10\/03\/the-origins-of-log5\/\">Here\u2019s more than you want to know.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; This does not necessarily represent Ken Pomeroy\u2019s opinion. There are subjective factors which this analysis does not include. Please use it responsibly.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Don\u2019t interpret these numbers as saying Ken Pomeroy\u2019s computer is predicting Arizona will win the tournament. It\u2019s saying there\u2019s an 84% chance they won\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; If you doubt that seeding doesn\u2019t matter (much) check out how similar the order of these teams is to the team\u2019s ranking in my system. Louisville doesn\u2019t suffer much as a four-seed. However, it&#8217;s a different story if you have to play extra game like Tennessee.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; No proximity bonus is included in any games here. <\/p>\n<pre>\nSeed Team           Rd32  Swt16  Elite8 Final4 Final  Champ  1 in\u2026\n 1W  Arizona        95.8   70.8   55.5   40.2   24.9   15.9    6\n 1S  Florida        95.7   71.6   51.2   35.7   22.6   12.9    8\n 4MW Louisville     87.3   71.5   44.3   31.5   19.7   12.3    8\n 1E  Virginia       96.7   77.4   52.9   35.4   21.2   11.5    9\n 1MW Wichita St.    95.4   68.1   36.8   24.4   13.9    8.0    13\n 2E  Villanova      92.3   62.3   41.3   21.0   10.8    5.0    20\n 3W  Creighton      87.0   59.1   36.1   16.6    7.6    3.6    27\n 2S  Kansas         88.2   58.1   34.5   16.1    8.0    3.5    29\n 3MW Duke           84.6   53.5   33.2   14.1    6.8    3.2    31\n 4E  Michigan St.   84.3   51.4   22.9   12.5    5.9    2.4    41\n 2W  Wisconsin      82.2   53.3   29.0   12.4    5.3    2.3    43\n 2MW Michigan       91.3   60.9   31.2   11.7    5.0    2.1    47\n 3S  Syracuse       83.6   48.4   25.2   10.5    4.7    1.8    55\n 5S  VCU            73.0   42.5   16.8    8.9    4.1    1.6    62\n 4S  UCLA           73.4   39.7   15.0    7.6    3.3    1.3    79\n 6S  Ohio St.       66.7   35.5   17.6    7.0    3.0    1.1    93\n 3E  Iowa St.       73.2   41.2   18.6    7.4    3.0    1.0    96\n 4W  San Diego St.  72.6   43.7   14.5    7.0    2.6    1.0    97\n 9S  Pittsburgh     71.5   23.0   11.9    5.9    2.5    0.9    108\n11MW Tennessee      40.9   20.8   11.9    4.5    2.0    0.9    117\n 8MW Kentucky       64.9   23.1    8.9    4.4    1.8    0.7    139\n 7E  Connecticut    63.2   25.7   13.7    5.3    2.0    0.7    145\n 6E  North Carolina 59.4   32.0   13.6    5.1    1.9    0.6    157\n 5E  Cincinnati     56.3   26.8    9.9    4.6    1.8    0.6    162\n 8W  Gonzaga        50.6   14.7    8.4    4.1    1.6    0.6    163\n 9W  Oklahoma St.   49.4   14.1    8.0    3.9    1.4    0.6    178\n 7S  New Mexico     56.9   24.0   11.1    3.8    1.4    0.5    222\n 5W  Oklahoma       63.3   32.3    9.3    4.0    1.3    0.4    223\n 7W  Oregon         60.0   27.2   11.8    3.9    1.3    0.4    233\n 6W  Baylor         58.9   24.0   11.2    3.7    1.2    0.4    253\n12E  Harvard        43.7   18.3    5.8    2.4    0.8    0.2    438\n11MW Iowa           26.2   11.3    5.6    1.7    0.6    0.2    451\n 5MW Saint Louis    57.1   14.4    4.3    1.7    0.5    0.2    638\n 7MW Texas          52.3   20.2    7.2    1.8    0.5    0.1    688\n10S  Stanford       43.1   15.5    6.2    1.8    0.6    0.1    690\n11E  Providence     40.6   18.1    6.2    1.8    0.5    0.1    729\n10MW Arizona St.    47.7   17.5    5.9    1.4    0.4    0.1    1015\n 9E  G. Washington  50.0   11.1    4.0    1.4    0.4    0.09   1062\n 8E  Memphis        50.0   11.1    4.0    1.4    0.4    0.09   1070\n11W  Nebraska       41.1   13.7    5.2    1.4    0.3    0.09   1111\n10W  BYU            40.0   14.5    5.0    1.3    0.3    0.08   1255\n10E  Saint Joseph's 36.8   10.8    4.4    1.2    0.3    0.08   1325\n11S  Dayton         33.3   12.5    4.2    1.1    0.3    0.07   1494\n 9MW Kansas St.     35.1    8.3    2.2    0.8    0.2    0.06   1704\n 6MW Massachusetts  33.0   10.6    3.9    0.8    0.2    0.05   1834\n12MW Xavier         27.2    6.2    1.7    0.6    0.2    0.05   2169\n12W  N. Dakota St.  36.7   14.0    2.7    0.8    0.2    0.04   2259\n12S  S.F. Austin    27.0    9.5    2.0    0.6    0.1    0.03   3397\n 8S  Colorado       28.5    4.8    1.5    0.4    0.1    0.02   5169\n13S  Tulsa          26.6    8.3    1.6    0.43   0.1    0.02   5361\n13W  New Mexico St. 27.4   10.1    1.7    0.4    0.09   0.02   5845\n14E  N.C. Central   26.8    8.6    2.1    0.4    0.09   0.01   6848\n13MW Manhattan      12.7    5.1    1.1    0.3    0.06   0.01   7639\n12MW N.C. State     15.7    2.8    0.6    0.2    0.04   0.008  12948\n15W  American       17.8    5.1    1.1    0.2    0.02   0.004  26625\n14MW Mercer         15.4    3.8    0.9    0.1    0.02   0.003  35657\n13E  Delaware       15.7    3.5    0.5    0.1    0.015  0.002  53891\n14S  Western Mich.  16.4    3.6    0.7    0.09   0.01   0.001  67027\n14W  La.-Lafayette  13.0    3.2    0.6    0.08   0.01   0.001  78951\n15S  E. Kentucky    11.8    2.4    0.4    0.05   0.006  0.0006 162840\n15E  Milwaukee       7.7    1.2    0.2    0.02   0.001  <.0001 992385\n16W  Weber St.       4.2    0.5    0.07   0.008  0.0006 <.0001 2104239\n15MW Wofford         8.7    1.4    0.14   0.008  0.0006 <.0001 2248165\n16MW Cal Poly        3.3    0.4    0.04   0.004  0.0003 <.0001 4225592\n16S  Albany          2.3    0.3    0.04   0.004  0.0003 <.0001 5124856\n16S  Mt. St. Mary's  2.0    0.2    0.03   0.002  0.0002 <.0001 8766968\n16E  Coastal Car.    3.3    0.4    0.03   0.002  0.0001 <.0001 20811710\n16MW Texas Southern  1.3    0.1    0.006  0.0004 <.0001 <.0001 106501028\n\nSeed Team           Rd32  Swt16  Elite8 Final4 Final  Champ  1 in\u2026\n 1E  Virginia       96.7   77.4   52.9   35.4   21.2   11.5    9\n 2E  Villanova      92.3   62.3   41.3   21.0   10.8    5.0    20\n 4E  Michigan St.   84.3   51.4   22.9   12.5    5.9    2.4    41\n 3E  Iowa St.       73.2   41.2   18.6    7.4    3.0    1.0    96\n 7E  Connecticut    63.2   25.7   13.7    5.3    2.0    0.7    145\n 6E  North Carolina 59.4   32.0   13.6    5.1    1.9    0.6    157\n 5E  Cincinnati     56.3   26.8    9.9    4.6    1.8    0.6    162\n12E  Harvard        43.7   18.3    5.8    2.4    0.8    0.2    438\n11E  Providence     40.6   18.1    6.2    1.8    0.5    0.1    729\n 9E  G. Washington  50.0   11.1    4.0    1.4    0.4    0.09   1062\n 8E  Memphis        50.0   11.1    4.0    1.4    0.4    0.09   1070\n10E  Saint Joseph's 36.8   10.8    4.4    1.2    0.3    0.08   1325\n14E  N.C. Central   26.8    8.6    2.1    0.4    0.09   0.01   6848\n13E  Delaware       15.7    3.5    0.5    0.1    0.015  0.002  53891\n15E  Milwaukee       7.7    1.2    0.2    0.02   0.001  <.0001 992385\n16E  Coastal Car.    3.3    0.4    0.03   0.002  0.0001 <.0001 20811710\n\nSeed Team           Rd32  Swt16  Elite8 Final4 Final  Champ  1 in\u2026\n 1S  Florida        95.7   71.6   51.2   35.7   22.6   12.9    8\n 2S  Kansas         88.2   58.1   34.5   16.1    8.0    3.5    29\n 3S  Syracuse       83.6   48.4   25.2   10.5    4.7    1.8    55\n 5S  VCU            73.0   42.5   16.8    8.9    4.1    1.6    62\n 4S  UCLA           73.4   39.7   15.0    7.6    3.3    1.3    79\n 6S  Ohio St.       66.7   35.5   17.6    7.0    3.0    1.1    93\n 9S  Pittsburgh     71.5   23.0   11.9    5.9    2.5    0.9    108\n 7S  New Mexico     56.9   24.0   11.1    3.8    1.4    0.5    222\n10S  Stanford       43.1   15.5    6.2    1.8    0.6    0.1    690\n11S  Dayton         33.3   12.5    4.2    1.1    0.3    0.07   1494\n12S  S.F. Austin    27.0    9.5    2.0    0.6    0.1    0.03   3397\n 8S  Colorado       28.5    4.8    1.5    0.4    0.1    0.02   5169\n13S  Tulsa          26.6    8.3    1.6    0.43   0.1    0.02   5361\n14S  Western Mich.  16.4    3.6    0.7    0.09   0.01   0.001  67027\n15S  E. Kentucky    11.8    2.4    0.4    0.05   0.006  0.0006 162840\n16S  Albany          2.3    0.3    0.04   0.004  0.0003 <.0001 5124856\n16S  Mt. St. Mary's  2.0    0.2    0.03   0.002  0.0002 <.0001 8766968\n\nSeed Team           Rd32  Swt16  Elite8 Final4 Final  Champ  1 in\u2026\n 4MW Louisville     87.3   71.5   44.3   31.5   19.7   12.3    8\n 1MW Wichita St.    95.4   68.1   36.8   24.4   13.9    8.0    13\n 3MW Duke           84.6   53.5   33.2   14.1    6.8    3.2    31\n 2MW Michigan       91.3   60.9   31.2   11.7    5.0    2.1    47\n11MW Tennessee      40.9   20.8   11.9    4.5    2.0    0.9    117\n 8MW Kentucky       64.9   23.1    8.9    4.4    1.8    0.7    139\n11MW Iowa           26.2   11.3    5.6    1.7    0.6    0.2    451\n 5MW Saint Louis    57.1   14.4    4.3    1.7    0.5    0.2    638\n 7MW Texas          52.3   20.2    7.2    1.8    0.5    0.1    688\n10MW Arizona St.    47.7   17.5    5.9    1.4    0.4    0.1    1015\n 9MW Kansas St.     35.1    8.3    2.2    0.8    0.2    0.06   1704\n 6MW Massachusetts  33.0   10.6    3.9    0.8    0.2    0.05   1834\n12MW Xavier         27.2    6.2    1.7    0.6    0.2    0.05   2169\n13MW Manhattan      12.7    5.1    1.1    0.3    0.06   0.01   7639\n12MW N.C. State     15.7    2.8    0.6    0.2    0.04   0.008  12948\n14MW Mercer         15.4    3.8    0.9    0.1    0.02   0.003  35657\n15MW Wofford         8.7    1.4    0.14   0.008  0.0006 <.0001 2248165\n16MW Cal Poly        3.3    0.4    0.04   0.004  0.0003 <.0001 4225592\n16MW Texas Southern  1.3    0.1    0.006  0.0004 <.0001 <.0001 106501028\n\nSeed Team           Rd32  Swt16  Elite8 Final4 Final  Champ  1 in\u2026\n 1W  Arizona        95.8   70.8   55.5   40.2   24.9   15.9    6\n 3W  Creighton      87.0   59.1   36.1   16.6    7.6    3.6    27\n 2W  Wisconsin      82.2   53.3   29.0   12.4    5.3    2.3    43\n 4W  San Diego St.  72.6   43.7   14.5    7.0    2.6    1.0    97\n 8W  Gonzaga        50.6   14.7    8.4    4.1    1.6    0.6    163\n 9W  Oklahoma St.   49.4   14.1    8.0    3.9    1.4    0.6    178\n 5W  Oklahoma       63.3   32.3    9.3    4.0    1.3    0.4    223\n 7W  Oregon         60.0   27.2   11.8    3.9    1.3    0.4    233\n 6W  Baylor         58.9   24.0   11.2    3.7    1.2    0.4    253\n11W  Nebraska       41.1   13.7    5.2    1.4    0.3    0.09   1111\n10W  BYU            40.0   14.5    5.0    1.3    0.3    0.08   1255\n12W  N. Dakota St.  36.7   14.0    2.7    0.8    0.2    0.04   2259\n13W  New Mexico St. 27.4   10.1    1.7    0.4    0.09   0.02   5845\n15W  American       17.8    5.1    1.1    0.2    0.02   0.004  26625\n14W  La.-Lafayette  13.0    3.2    0.6    0.08   0.01   0.001  78951\n16W  Weber St.       4.2    0.5    0.07   0.008  0.0006 <.0001 2104239\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What follows is the master log5 for the 68-team field. At the risk of being lumped in with Rick Reilly, I will recycle the disclaimers from last year: &#8211; The calculations below represent the chance of each team advancing to a specific round based on the log5 formula and each team\u2019s pythagorean rating. Unfamiliar with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}