{"id":165,"date":"2014-11-17T15:20:42","date_gmt":"2014-11-17T21:20:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/67.227.157.91\/~kenpom\/wp_blog\/the-slowest-season\/"},"modified":"2014-11-17T15:20:42","modified_gmt":"2014-11-17T21:20:42","slug":"the-slowest-season","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/the-slowest-season\/","title":{"rendered":"The slowest season(?)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You can\u2019t make many sweeping judgments three days into the season, especially with so few compelling games being played. Favorites in my system have gone 168-20 so far, which is not testimony to the greatness of my preseason ratings, but that a simple preseason rating algorithm can easily predict winners with so many mismatches on the early schedule.<\/p>\n<p>However, there has been one interesting development: This could be the slowest-paced season that college hoops has seen. The previous record for patience was set just two seasons ago. Of course, last season we had the sweeping crackdown on contact with the ballhandler and a block\/charge interpretation that was friendlier to the offense, with an intent to reverse the trend of lower scoring in the game. <\/p>\n<p>Early last season, I was stoked that coaches, fans, media, and officials had accepted this new approach in the college game. Fouls were called in bundles, pace and scoring increased significantly, and to my surprise the reaction wasn\u2019t completely negative. We could all look forward to the day when fewer fouls were called as players adjusted to the new paradigm. <\/p>\n<p>Fewer fouls were called as the season progressed, just as it happens in any season, but then came March. And the postseason tournaments were played at a <a href=\"http:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/tourney-scoring-up-pace-down\">pace significantly slower than the previous season<\/a>. This season, the sport is picking up where it left off with what is probably the slowest-paced start to the season in the sport\u2019s history. (We obviously don\u2019t have data going back far to test this, but realistically, only some years <a href=\"http:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/state-of-the-game-2011\">in the early 80\u2019s<\/a> are possible competition.)<\/p>\n<p>And even with just 188 games between Division-I teams in the books, there\u2019s enough data to predict that this season\u2019s pace will challenge 2013 for an all-time low. As seen in the table below, the early data is a reliable predictor of season-long pace. <\/p>\n<pre>      Early    Season\nYear Poss\/gm* Poss\/gm  \n2002  70.8     69.6   \n2003  72.0     68.6   \n2004  70.7     67.7   \n2005  69.1     67.3   \n2006  68.9     67.0   \n2007  70.5     66.9   \n2008  70.6     67.0   \n2009  69.7     66.5   \n2010  70.4     67.3   \n2011  70.9     66.8   \n2012  70.2     66.2   \n2013  69.3     65.9   \n2014  70.6     66.6  \n2015  68.5     ???   \n<\/pre>\n<p>*Through first Sunday of the season<\/p>\n<p>Fitting a linear trend through previous seasons would give us a season-long prediction of 66.11 for this season, which would rank just behind 2013 as the second-slowest season ever. Based on the simple regression, there\u2019s about a 38 percent chance that the full-season average pace will be less than the 2013 value of 65.92.<\/p>\n<p>Discuss among yourselves whether that\u2019s good or bad&#8212;personally, I prefer a lot of transition in my hoops viewing experience&#8212;but one thing is clear after three days: In terms of pace, the game is very close to where it was before the much publicized change in rules interpretations last season.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You can\u2019t make many sweeping judgments three days into the season, especially with so few compelling games being played. Favorites in my system have gone 168-20 so far, which is not testimony to the greatness of my preseason ratings, but that a simple preseason rating algorithm can easily predict winners with so many mismatches on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kenpom.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}