
Buy it!
| January 2009 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
My espn.com archives
Most recent entries
Patience
The RPI is Dead
BP is on line!
Moving On
What the heck is not going on here?
Monthly Archives
December 2008
November 2008
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
Complete Archives
Category Archives
Blogging Superheroes
yoco:: College Basketball
The Mid-Majority
big ten wonk
Other College Hoops Blogs
Yet Another Basketball Blog
Patriot League Hoops
The CAA: Life as a Mid-Major
CrossCyed
Vandy Sabermetrics
The Courtmaster
Phog Blog
Big Ten Chronicle
Hoops Nerd
NIT-ology
March Madness All Season
K-State Stats
Section Six
Hoya Prospectus
The Joe Cribbs Car Wash
Syndicate
Hits on this page: 2552324
Page rendered in 0.1600 seconds
Thursday, February 17, 2005
The Year of the Mid Major
You're starting to hear it more and more. Oh, how those power conferences have really fallen. Finally, the little guy will get his revenge. The Chinese recently celebrated the Year of the Rooster and college hoops observers are starting to hail the Year of the Catamounts, Salukis, and Monarchs.
These statements have been driven in large part by the RPI - an RPI that changed its formula this season. Hey look, Vermont is in the top 20! Pacific is in the top 25! Hoo-rah! The RPI now favors teams from outside the power conferences, that should be obvious. But measuring teams by a new formula is akin to someone measuring themselves in pounds one day and kilograms the next and concluding that their diet is really working.
In a sense, it doesn't matter whether the power conferences are really worse this year, they are going to be less represented in the NCAA Tournament. But the top six conferences aren't suddenly having their worst season in recent memory. Sure the SEC is down. But the Big East is equally better. The ACC is a little worse, but the Pac 10 has rebounded slightly.
To fairly compare activity over the last two seasons, use a formula that has been the same over that time. You can use whatever system you want and you'll find out there really is no change. Naturally, I will pimp my own system for this exercise. All data is through Tuesday's games.
Top 50 Teams (Pomeroy Ratings)
2005 2004
ACC 6 7
SEC 7 6
Big XII 6 6
Big Ten 6 4
Big East 6 8
Pac 10 3 2
Total 34 33
The non-conference records of the six conferences collectively (D1 opponents only):
2005: 593-187, .760 2004: 562-186, .751
