blog | pomeroy ratings | stats

Wednesday, August 11, 2004

The Lucky Ones

Just like with my post on the unlucky teams, I'm going to start this post on the lucky teams with a look at what happened two years ago. The following are the ten luckiest teams - as measured by wins over expected - from 2003 with their actual 2003 conference record in parenthesis.

  1 Niagara                +2.5 (12- 6)
  2 Mercer                 +2.5 (14- 2)
  3 Prairie View A&M       +2.4 (14- 4)
  4 Southern Illinois      +2.4 (16- 2)
  5 Wake Forest            +2.3 (13- 3)
  6 Wyoming                +2.3 ( 8- 6)
  7 Weber St.              +2.2 (14- 0)
  8 Massachusetts          +2.1 ( 5-10)
  9 William & Mary         +2.1 ( 7-11)
 10 Wichita St.            +2.1 (12- 6)

In 2004 the teams above lost an average of 3.5 more conference games than in 2003. This shows much more of a decline than the unlucky teams showed improvement.

Here's the top 10, plus some other notables from 2004:

  1 Toledo                 +3.2 (12- 6)
  2 Stetson                +3.1 (10-10)
  3 Southern Illinois      +3.0 (17- 1)
  4 Prairie View A&M       +2.8 ( 7-11)
  5 Wisconsin Green Bay    +2.7 (11- 5)
  6 East Tennessee St.     +2.7 (16- 1)
  7 Virginia Tech          +2.5 ( 7- 9)
  8 Chicago St.            +2.5 ( 9- 7)
  9 Austin Peay            +2.4 (16- 0)
 10 Alcorn St.             +2.3 ( 9- 9)
 13 Pacific                +2.2 (17- 1)
 14 Stanford               +2.1 (17- 1)
 15 Syracuse               +2.1 (11- 5)
 16 Princeton              +2.0 (13- 1)
 22 Tennessee              +1.9 ( 7- 9)
 25 Virginia               +1.8 ( 6-10)

Stanford and Virginia were beneficiaries of the most high-profile last-second heroics last year, so it's comforting to see them show up fairly high on the list.

Syracuse is the team I want to focus on. They'll likely be a preseason top 10 team and it's hard not to buy into the hype with Hakim Warrick and Gerry McNamara among the best in the nation at their positions. Then there's the expected return of point guard Billy Edelin who missed a good chunk of last year with personal problems.

So yeah, there's reason for optimism in Orangeland. But there's also reason to believe that the opinions of last year's Syracuse team are inflated. Even their sweet 16 run was built on a couple of games that were decided in the final minute, including a win over an overseeded Maryland in the second round.

Sure, the 'Cuse will be better this year. But if they prove to be a top 5 team, it would be a better coaching job by Jim Boeheim that the national championship run of two years ago.

Posted on 08/11 at 10:34 PM
PythagorasPermalinkE-mail me
Page 1 of 1 pages

E-mail me


Golf ratings
(under development)


Most recent entries

  • Conference tournaments not a bad way to decide best team
  • Saturday morning reading
  • A belated answer
  • Quick question
  • No, Kansas did not choke
  • The loneliest number
  • Give Coach Boze a chance
  • Majerus does the unthinkable…again
  • Excerpts from 1953: New rules
  • Conference projections
  • Monthly Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • Complete Archives
  • Category Archives
  • BP archives
  • espn.com archives
  • Feeds

  • RSS
  • Atom
  • Search



    Powered by ExpressionEngine