
| October 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
My Big 12 preview
My espn.com archives
Most recent entries
BP is on line!
Moving On
What the heck is not going on here?
NST’s
The Orange Effect
Monthly Archives
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
Complete Archives
Category Archives
Blogging Superheroes
yoco:: College Basketball
big ten wonk
The Mid-Majority
Other College Hoops Blogs
Patriot League Hoops
Tempo-Free Suburbia
The Bracket Board
UNC Basketball Update
Villanova by the Numbers
NIT-ology
Phog Blog
Hoop Time
Hoops Nerd
Section Six
ACC Now
UCLA Blog
Basketball Junkie
Cracked Sidewalks
K-State Stats
Syndicate
Hits on this page: 2391743
Page rendered in 0.4149 seconds
Friday, March 31, 2006
Final Four Breakdown: UCLA/LSU
When UCLA has the ball (national rank listed):
UCLA O LSU D AdjEff 23 4 eFG 22 32 TO% 223 184 OR% 50 30 FTs 94 4
This game is being featured as a defensive showdown, but it deserves pointing out that the offenses aren’t too shabby. You don’t get this far without being able to do a few things right offensively. Remember that on paper, GMU/UConn should have been a game in the 60s or low 70s and it became a shootout.
UCLA’s 50-45 win over Memphis got panned due to the freakishly low score. But UCLA went 20-of-39 from the line. With ten more made free throws - not an unrealistic assumption - UCLA’s offensive efficiency works out to about 91. While that doesn’t wow you, it’s a lot better that than the 76 they really had, and it’s against a team whose defense is its calling card. I’m not saying I expect UCLA to run wild on LSU, but if people are basing UCLA’s offensive potential based on 50 points against Memphis, they have been misled.
When LSU has the ball:
LSU O UCLA D AdjEff 40 3 eFG 115 42 TO% 195 92 OR% 16 48 FTs 130 65
UCLA’s defense is solid all the way around, while LSU’s offense tends to rely on rebounding. Arron Afflalo is regarded as the Bruins’ defensive stopper. His natural matchup would seem to be Garrett Temple. The only problem is, offensively, Temple is by far the least active starter in the Final Four. So I’m curious as to how Afflalo will be deployed. His other options are one of the Mitchells, each of which provides quite a different set of challenges. The best option may be to have Afflalo check Temple and also be the guy most eager to double the post.
Yes, we can probably rule out a high scoring game in this one. Only 3 of UCLA’s past 14 opponents have topped 1 PPP. None of LSU’s tourney opponents have cracked 90 in offensive efficiency. If either team gets to 70, it should win going away.
