CourtIntelligence powered by

Most recent entries

  • Offense vs. Defense: 3-point percentage
  • Offense vs. Defense: average possession length
  • Is free throw defense real?
  • Offense vs. Defense: free throw percentage
  • Offense vs. Defense: the eternal struggle
  • Your 2015 kPOY: Frank Kaminsky
  • The NRG effect
  • Jump ball data
  • Sweet 16 log5
  • The 30-second shot clock is here
  • The good stuff

    At other venues...
  • ($)
  • Deadspin
  • Slate

  • Strategy
  • Whether to foul up 3 late
  • The value of 2-for-1’s
  • Whether to foul when tied (1, 2, 3)

  • Philosophy
  • All points are not created equal
  • Brady Heslip’s non-slump
  • The magic of negative motivation
  • A treatise on plus-minus
  • The preseason AP poll is great
  • The lack of information in close-game performance
  • Why I don’t believe in clutchness*

  • Fun stuff
  • The missing 1-point games
  • Which two teams last lost longest ago?
  • How many first-round picks will Kentucky have?
  • Prepare for the Kobe invasion
  • Predicting John Henson's free throw percentage
  • Can Derrick Williams set the three-point accuracy record?
  • Play-by-play Theater: earliest disqualification
  • Monthly Archives

  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003

  • RSS feed

    An important message

    by Ken Pomeroy on Monday, October 31, 2011

    I’m going to a subscription model this season. I don’t know if I need to say any more than that because most of you reading this, especially if it’s in the first week of November, know what to expect when you come here. And you may have even considered what would happen if you were no longer allowed to freely roam around all corners of this place. So perhaps the rest of this is unnecessary, but I encourage you to read on.

    I’ve maintained this site for roughly a decade. Admittedly, it was pretty awful in its initial form. After a few years of aimless wandering, the goal of this site became more focused late in the 2004 season: Improve the understanding of college basketball through statistical analysis. I’ve talked ad nauseum about why the light bulb went on then so I won’t repeat it here, but since then, I’ve had a clear idea of what I want to do with this place.

    I would like to think that any success this site has experienced has been because it isn’t a “stat site”. There’s a conscious effort here not to throw as many stats as possible at you, but to provide insight. Posting things like points per game, rebound margin, or field goal percentage would bring mainstream eyeballs to the site, but you don’t see them here for a reason – they provide less insight than more advanced statistics. Traditional primitive statistics have a higher risk of misleading the audience, and thus, have no place on my site.

    When successful coaches go looking for insight, they are coming here, and I think that’s because is not a stockpile of stats, it’s a clearinghouse of information. There’s credibility here that distinguishes this site from others that are driven by a different mission. Heck, I’m even willing to give a critical eye to metrics that I once embraced.

    In the interest of distributing this information, I’ve long been reluctant to hoist the pay wall despite an avalanche of advice to the contrary. If one is going to influence people’s thinking through information, adding an obstacle to accessing that information is counterproductive. Obviously, generating meaningful revenue would be nice, especially when that process is compatible with the site’s mission. But clearly, in the early years of this site it was not in my best interest to charge a fee or even clutter the site with ads. If you want to open people’s minds there have to be minds available to being opened.

    I’m going the subscription route now because the site has pretty much achieved saturation among its intended audience. If you are interested in a more objective way to evaluate teams and players, then I’d like to think you know about this place and if it has some value to you, you’ll be willing to compensate me for my work. And if you’re not interested in doing this, we’ll still be friends. No hard feelings, I promise.

    So beginning this season, you’ll need to pay $20 per year to access the data on the site. What does your subscription get? Well, for starters, you should know that the main ratings page and the blog will still be freely available to the public. However, if you want to drill down into team details or see any of the other information that brings insight to your college hoops experience, you’ll need to subscribe. And while the blog will still be on the free side, much of its content will refer to stuff behind the pay wall.

    Beyond that, it’s difficult to promise specifics. Sure, I have stuff that I am working on, but right now I can’t be sure which of these this will be worth sharing. All I can promise is the innovation that has been a staple here for the past seven years. I won’t be creating new stats for the sake of creating them, but creating things that will help us understand our teams better. New tools being evaluated are things others haven’t conceived, and some of them are things I haven’t conceived. So much stuff just happens during the season in moments of inspiration. And I hope some these things will include member participation.

    This move is not without its risks. The frequent links I get from the titans of the Internet will go away. (Though you’re still totally free to refer to stats that are on the subscriber side, guys and gals! Fair use, and all that.) And there will be other sites that fill this gap, perhaps substituting insight for ad-plastered pizzazz. However, I feel confident that this site will continue to enhance your understanding of college hoops in ways that others can’t provide.

    Much like this site was to first to publish offensive and defensive efficiency for every team in D-I, the first to publish individual advanced statistics for every player in D-I, the first to post win probability graphs for every game in D-I, and the first to publish preseason predictions for every D-I game (coming Thursday!), my hope is that it will be the first to do other things that will become standards as well. So in addition to the insight you’ve become accustomed to, you’ll also be getting that innovation for your money. If you have enjoyed being a part of that for the past seven years, I think you’ll get plenty of value for your money.

    [Administrative note: I plan to start accepting subscriptions by approximately next Monday. However, the pay wall won’t be turned on until the weekend of November 12th.]