
| October 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
My Big 12 preview
My espn.com archives
Most recent entries
BP is on line!
Moving On
What the heck is not going on here?
NST’s
The Orange Effect
Monthly Archives
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
Complete Archives
Category Archives
Blogging Superheroes
big ten wonk
The Mid-Majority
yoco:: College Basketball
Other College Hoops Blogs
Basketball Junkie
Vandy Sabermetrics
March Madness All Season
Patriot League Hoops
CrossCyed
Big Ten Chronicle
Chris West
NIT-ology
ACC Basketblog
MGoBlog
Tempo-Free Suburbia
ACC Now
The Courtmaster
The Joe Cribbs Car Wash
Hoop Time
Syndicate
Hits on this page: 2391702
Page rendered in 0.2830 seconds
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
Cants Win It All Without Rashad
UNC's Rashad McCants has missed the Tar Heels last four games due to a mysterious intestinal disorder. UNC has won all four games, but not surprisingly, they have not been as dominant without him. Most of the minutes vacated by McCants have been snapped up by the offensively-challenged and smaller Melvin Scott. How has McCants' absence affected his team? Let's look at how UNC performed in the four games without him, and against those same opponents earlier in the season when McCants played.
With McCants Without McCants
-Opponent- Tempo OE DE Tempo OE DE
NC St. 67.9 140 105 62.9 129 113
Maryland 89.4 122 84 72.6 117 114
Florida St. 68.0 119 88 73.4 124 103
Duke 71.5 98 99 68.0 110 107
Average 74.2 120 94 69.2 120 109
If you have been reading this blog for a while then you're familiar with what these numbers mean, but for those who aren't...
Tempo: Number of possessions in the game. It's estimated from box score data, so that's the reason there aren't round numbers listed.
OE: Offensive Efficiency. It's 100 multiplied by points scored divided by possessions. Higher numbers are better.
DE: Defensive Efficiency. It's 100 multiplied by points allowed divided by possessions. Lower numbers are better.
From this simple analysis, UNC's change has taken place on the defensive end where they have been unable to keep any of their last four opponents under a point per possession. We're only talking four games here, but the difference is significant enough to take note of.
As a few of the stats page zealots have noted, Carolina's defense has been more exceptional than their offense this season. It's a fact you're not likely to hear in any tournament previews, which will mainly gush about how many points the Heels score. But their adjusted defensive efficiency ranks first nationally, while in the same stat on the offensive side they rank fourth.
I don't think it takes much of a leap to say that it's because of that defensive prowess that UNC is able to score consistently and score quickly. UNC has enough scorers to fill the McCants void, but they aren't getting the fast break opportunities that they used to get, because they aren't forcing as many missed shots and turnovers as they used to. This is reflected in the decrease in tempo, although in fairness, most of the decrease is attributable to the difference in the Maryland games.
The reduction in defense is one reason why UNC is less upset-proof without McCants, but the decrease in possessions is also important because it gives UNC fewer opportunities for their talent to demonstrate its superiority. So if UNC is going to make a run at a title, they need to get McCants back.
Or alternatively, try to suit up the other McCants that will be in the tournament.
