
| October 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
My Big 12 preview
My espn.com archives
Most recent entries
BP is on line!
Moving On
What the heck is not going on here?
NST’s
The Orange Effect
Monthly Archives
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
Complete Archives
Category Archives
Blogging Superheroes
The Mid-Majority
big ten wonk
yoco:: College Basketball
Other College Hoops Blogs
Section Six
March Madness All Season
ACC Now
Basketball Junkie
Vandy Sabermetrics
Hoop Time
Hoya Prospectus
Blue Devil Hoops
Villanova by the Numbers
SEC Hoops
Double-A Zone
UCLA Blog
K-State Stats
Phog Blog
MGoBlog
Syndicate
Hits on this page: 2391712
Page rendered in 0.3480 seconds
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
All For One
So Oklahoma pulled off an astounding fourth straight one-point victory last night. This hasn’t been done before in the limited data I have. Three straight one-point wins has only been done once since the ‘99 season - two years ago by High Point. If you have followed this streak, you have seen some examples of how luck is a large factor in determining the outcome of close games. As a further demonstration, I pulled every occurrence of a team playing two consecutive one-point games in the last eight seasons. Here were the results:
Record Times 2-0 43 1-1 84 0-2 33
This works out almost the way a coin flip situation should. You’d expect 25% in each of the first and last bins and 50% in the middle one. Take 3 each from the 2-0 and 1-1 and put them in the 0-2 and that’s exactly what you would have. I don’t know what this proves, as the outcome of one-point games is not totally determined by luck - you’d expect talent to have some impact. It would be more instructive to look at cases where there is a big talent gap and see how the favorite fared in these games.
Line o’ the Night
FG 3pt FT Reb
Min M-A M-A M-A O-T A F S TO BLK Pts
Paul Millsap 35 8-13 0-0 4-5 7-18 2 3 1 2 0 20
Result: Win. Louisiana Tech 74, Idaho 49.
Lost in the hysteria over the scoring title is that Millsap is in a tough battle for his third consecutive rebounding crown with Hartford’s Kenny Adeleke. With this effort, it’s Millsap 13.069 rpg, Adeleke 13.037 rpg. Conference tournaments will decide this one.
