Charting Day 1
03.16.07
Possessions estimated unless HD data available.
Boston College 84, Texas Tech 75 [62 possessions]. The flex offense is right up there with the Princeton in terms of potency. But it just seems like the Eagles intentionally take off possessions defensively. I’d like to think this catches up with you eventually. Or, like, on Saturday, when you have to play a devastating offensive team.
Maryland 82, Davidson 70 [80!]. Maryland officially becomes “dangerous”. Their D hasn’t had a bad game in a long time, and their offense has the kind of balance that should scare any team not named the Hurricanes. Nice effort by Davidson, and we’ll hear more from Stephen Curry for sure.
Louisville 78, Stanford 58 [69]. Terrence Williams: 4 FGA’s and 4 assists. That’s a recipe for success. Folks that have Louisville in the Final Four, you have my admiration. Were they playing any other 3-seed in the second round, I’d be feeling good about your chances. Pitino is possibly the best tournament coach out there, but I have a feeling Gillispie will have a similar legacy within a decade. Louisville/Texas A&M should not be a second round game. Nor should it be in Lexington. This one is more of a toss-up than people realize.
Washington State 70, Oral Roberts 54 [58]. Six turnovers by the Cougars, but that’s what they do. Where’s a Marchello Vealy 3-point outbreak when you need it?
Butler 57, Old Dominion 46 [55]. Our one man efficiency-band Pete Campbell gets hot midway though the second half, hitting three 3’s in the span of 1:29. And in a game this low-scoring, that was huge.
Georgetown 80, Belmont 55 [62]. With Jeff Green on the floor, Georgetown outscored Belmont 35-30. With Roy Hibbert on the floor, the Hoyas had a 41-21 advantage. I wonder what the difference could have been: Hibbert’s 28.6 DR%, his 35.0 OR%, his 30.8 Assist%, his 21.4 Block%, or his zero turnovers? I know it was only Belmont, but it was as dominating of a game as you’ll see in the non-points stats in 21 minutes.
Texas A&M 68, Penn 52 [62]. A minor scare here for the Aggies who trailed with 13 minutes to go, but closed out the Quakers with a 31-13 spurt. Acie Law played all but 1:04 of this one. How long can he last against the Cardinal press? What A&M does with Donald Sloan running the point could be crucial. Worst case scenario relating to this situation was their game in the altitude against run-and-gun Colorado. Law played 26:40 and was +14, Sloan played 23:57 and was +13, so it’s not like Sloan is unreliable. This game will be slower paced than that one and not at altitude, so Law should be good for 35 minutes barring foul trouble, anyway.
Vanderbilt 77, George Washington 44 [65]. Has anybody ever figured out why CBS insists on the mid-afternoon blackout game? Just show us the damn game. We missed GW shooting 30.2% eFG.
Ohio State 78, Central Connecticut 57 [63]. Next.
VCU 79, Duke 77 [70]. So my Coach K love-fest nightmare has been avoided. Thank you, Eric Maynor. Talk during the game was how Duke was getting worn down, but VCU was not appreciably deeper that the Blue Devils. So shouldn’t we be questioning Duke’s stamina? Quite a few goofy questions in the post-game press conference, but none about this that I heard. Think we might hear some Anthony Grant coaching rumors next week? Or the week after. Maynor is going to give Pitt’s suspect perimeter D fits.
Michigan State 61, Marquette 49 [58]. Only saw about a minute of this one, which is fine since I’ve seen enough elbow dislocations for one season. Thought my box score parser was on the fritz seeing such few opportunities for assists by Marquette players. But they really only made 15 shots, with 29 of their 47 attempts coming from long range. Apparently, the Dunk Police dedicated this shift in Idong Ibok’s honor.
UCLA 70, Weber State 42 [61]. Next.
Xavier 79, BYU 77 [67]. The most entertaining game of the day. Both teams like to push and a partisan crowd always adds a little something. Not to mention one of only two games that were decided in the final minute.
Indiana 70, Gonzaga 57 [67]. Didn’t catch much of this one, but what little I saw involved the commentators obsessing over Abdullahi Kuso’s excellent defense on DJ White. If it was so great, why did Kuso only play 17 minutes? According to the HDBS, White must have been pretty dominant while Kuso was on the bench.
North Carolina 86, Eastern Kentucky 65 [72]. Eastern Kentucky went on a 29-9 run midway through the game. It would have been more interesting to start the game that way. Carolina had a TO% north of 30, but with an eFG% of 77.2 and an OR% of 52.4.
Pitt 79, Wright State 58 [70]. A fitting way to end the day.
Florida Isn’t Going to the Final Four
03.15.07
You’ll recall last year at this time, I went a little postal on how many experts were forecasting a Duke/UConn final, when such a game was much more of a longshot than the pundits’ unanimity suggested.
The gutless wonders out there picking a Duke/UConn final make me laugh. I mean that could happen, but it’s not as likely as a lot of people are making it out to be.
Geez. Relax, man.
But looking at this years predictions, I can’t help but feel some deja vu. Here’s how the 22 experts on ESPN.com, SI.com, and CBS Sportsline picked the Final Four.
West: UCLA 11, Kansas 10, Virginia Tech 1
South: Texas A&M 11, Ohio St. 8, Memphis 2, Virginia 1
East: Georgetown 11, UNC 9, Texas 2
Midwest: Florida 22
88 Final Four teams picked and exactly six outside of the Trendy Seven. Look, it doesn’t take an expert to tell us that a member of the Trendy Seven is good, so can’t somebody pick a darkhorse or two? (No, not Virginia, Dennis Dodd. I mean a team that actually has a chance.) All we’ve been hearing about is how great the Pac-10 is, and yet not a single Pac-10 team in the mix, despite a couple of 3-seeds out there. How about Southern Illinois or Nevada, who finished in the AP Top 15? Heck, Wisconsin and Memphis got in as 2-seeds and have only 2 picks between them. A lot of people allegedly thought those teams were pretty good down the stretch.
But nothing burns me more than the fact that everybody picked Florida.
I can’t stress this enough, but chances are better that Florida isn’t going to Atlanta than is. Whether you believe log5 or the betting public. Or even if you believe Florida has been dogging it to this point, which they surely have to some extent.
Of course, we know the Gators are the best team in the region. We don’t need power ratings or experts to tell us that. That’s not exactly the point. The point is, it’s March Madness. And every team in the field needs at least some luck to get to the Final Four. Florida might need it less than anybody else, but they still need it.
Enjoy the games…Oh, and I’m picking Georgia Tech from the Midwest.
Yeah, crazy, I know. Sure, they could lose to UNLV. They will lose to UNLV if they play D like they did against Wake Forest. Heck, they’d lose to Nevada-Tonopah if they played D like that.
But you don’t need me to tell you that Georgia Tech isn’t the best team in the region. However, if they had UVa’s conference schedule and luck, the Jackets would be a 4-seed, and somebody might be picking them. Or maybe still just me. Whatever.
By the way, nice e-mail by Greg S. in the Wonk blog yesterday. Nobody, I mean nobody, is sticking up for Wisconsin, either. Yet the argument that their offensive slump is as much schedule-based as Butch-based is a legitimate one. Not one I necessarily buy, but legitimate. And their D should still be dominant without Butch given the team-based nature of the Ryan system. So if you want a “safer” non-Florida pick, Wisconsin isn’t bad. Neither is Maryland.
But please, fight the power. It’s more fun that way.
Finally, a parting e-mail from our log5 contributor, Mr. Picklesimer…
Hi Ken,
I just did these calculations for fun using the percentages chart I sent you…just thought I’d share. I haven’t double-checked them, but they’d be easy enough to check again if you don’t believe any certain ones. There certainly are some interesting ones in here:
A #1-seed has a 60.22% chance of winning it all
A #2-seed has a 22.21% chance
A #3-seed has a 8.55% chance
There’s a 93.87% chance the winner will be seeded 1-4Teams seeded #13 or below have only a 0.171% chance of making the final four
Most likely of these teams to make final four: Davidson…by farWinner from the East: 33.80%
From the Midwest: 19.64%
From the South: 19.49%
From the West: 27.06%40.04% chance we’ll see all 4 #1’s in the Sweet 16
16.47% chance we’ll see all 4 #1’s in the Elite 8
3.12% chance we’ll see all 4 #1’s in the final four
6.21% chance we’ll see the top 2 overall in the finals (UF vs. UNC)Champion by major conference:
ACC: 28.01% (7 teams)
Big 12: 27.46% (4 teams)
Big 10: 16.92% (6 teams)
Big East: 11.35% (6 teams)
SEC: 9.09% (5 teams)
Pac-10: 3.83% (6 teams)
Once again, I really can’t thank you enough for all the data you provide and maintain.
-Kevin
Bracket Breakdown: South/East
03.14.07
I’ve been under the weather, so I’m not in the mood to write much. Fortunately, these two regions are not very complicated.
First, the South:
2nd Rd Sweet16 Elite8 Final4 Finals Champs 1 Ohio St. 98.62% 82.16% 68.80% 41.49% 21.00% 11.32% 3 Texas A&M 95.07% 70.87% 46.80% 27.35% 13.31% 6.91% 2 Memphis 98.03% 73.77% 34.47% 16.88% 6.59% 2.76% 6 Louisville 71.81% 23.52% 10.88% 4.33% 1.31% 0.43% 5 Tennessee 87.40% 51.42% 12.43% 3.29% 0.68% 0.15% 9 Xavier 61.50% 12.37% 6.84% 1.89% 0.41% 0.09% 10 Creighton 67.29% 20.26% 5.54% 1.68% 0.37% 0.09% 4 Virginia 89.61% 44.80% 9.40% 2.15% 0.38% 0.07% 8 BYU 38.50% 5.37% 2.36% 0.46% 0.07% 0.01% 11 Stanford 28.19% 4.89% 1.29% 0.29% 0.05% 0.01% 7 Nevada 32.71% 5.85% 0.94% 0.18% 0.02% 0.00% 12 LB St 12.60% 2.48% 0.12% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 14 Pennsylvania 4.93% 0.72% 0.08% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 13 Albany 10.39% 1.30% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16 C. Conn. 1.38% 0.09% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 North Texas 1.97% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
This is the weakest region of the four, and just about every bracket will have Ohio State or Texas A&M. But Memphis and Louisville are legitimate darkhorse picks, especially considering Louisville’s semi-home court advantage in a 2nd round game against A&M, which isn’t accounted for here.
A while ago, I surmised that Ohio State could survive with Greg Oden on the bench better than the most pundits thought. But after doing the research, that was, um, wrong. Here’s Oden’s on/off plus/minus data for the ten most recent games that substitution data is available for.
On Off Min Michigan St. +10 -1 33:18 Michigan +17 -4 29:47 Purdue + 8 -1 21:08 Penn St. +11 -9 30:46 Penn St. +10 -2 22:47 Wisconsin + 7 -6 34:51 Michigan + 9 -5 32:38 Michigan +14 -4 27:30 Purdue +13 -2 32:28 Wisconsin +15 +2 23:01 Sum +114 -32 28:49 Oden On / 40 +15.8 Oden Off / 40 -11.5 Difference +27.3
Wow. Statistically, Ohio State is the most likely of the #1’s to go down in the first round. If I’m Central Connecticut, I go right at Oden every possession and flop when gets the ball in the post. Oden might end up with 30 points and 15 blocks with this strategy, but he almost might pick up a couple early fouls, and getting him on the bench is the only chance a big underdog has to hang with the Buckeyes.
Which is another reason why Texas A&M is a smart pick. Not that A&M would be a big underdog, but they’re an underdog against Ohio State for sure. Joseph Jones and Antanas Kavaliauskas draw fouls as well as anybody. Of course, they also pick them up in large numbers, too.
First round tidbit: Look for the Long Beach State/Tennessee game to be the fastest paced contest of the whole tourney.
Here’s the East Region:
2nd Rd Sweet16 Elite8 Final4 Finals Champs
1 N. Carolina 99.26% 81.43% 67.94% 48.69% 32.61% 20.90%
2 Georgetown 96.59% 81.33% 67.30% 32.43% 17.66% 9.09%
4 Texas 88.43% 55.85% 14.54% 6.11% 2.14% 0.69%
9 Mich. St. 60.71% 12.72% 7.24% 3.09% 1.10% 0.36%
3 Wash. St. 81.51% 52.09% 14.57% 3.27% 0.83% 0.19%
12 Arkansas 55.18% 24.33% 4.61% 1.52% 0.40% 0.09%
7 Boston Coll. 64.90% 13.48% 7.16% 1.44% 0.33% 0.07%
8 Marquette 39.29% 5.82% 2.70% 0.91% 0.24% 0.06%
6 Vanderbilt 71.57% 34.34% 7.68% 1.35% 0.27% 0.05%
5 USC 44.82% 17.69% 2.86% 0.83% 0.19% 0.04%
10 Texas Tech 35.10% 4.62% 1.79% 0.22% 0.03% 0.00%
13 New Mex. St. 11.57% 2.13% 0.11% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00%
11 GW 28.43% 8.04% 0.90% 0.08% 0.01% 0.00%
14 Oral Roberts 18.49% 5.52% 0.52% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00%
15 Belmont 3.41% 0.57% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
16 E. Kentucky 0.74% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
This appears to be a two-team race but I think that Texas is undervalued in my system right now. UNC has quite the minefield to negotiate to get to the regional finals, with potentially scary games against Michigan State in the 2nd round and Texas in the 3rd round. Georgetown’s path is much easier with BC or Texas Tech and then likely Washington State or Vandy. However, the Tar Heels are still the most likely champion according to log5. Even so, there’s nearly an 80% chance they won’t be cutting down the nets.
First round tidbit: Arkansas was the most bizarre at-large selection, having a sub-.500 conference record in the embarrassingly weak SEC West. But the committee set themselves up to look good by pairing them with USC.
I’ll post some tourney-wide statistical miscellany tomorrow morning.