by Ken Pomeroy on Friday, December 5, 2014
Hey everyone, here’s what you might or might not have missed over the past two weeks.Biggest upsets
3. Nov. 29: #316 NJIT 84, #120 Duquesne 81 (8%). The Highlanders are still the country’s only independent, and therefore must earn an at-large bid to get into the NCAA tournament. Wins at Duquense help that cause. Except NJIT has already been swept by UMass Lowell, so they’re not going to be the first independent since DePaul in 1991 to make the tournament. They do have sophomore shooting guard Damon Lynn, who may well own the career three-point attempt record in two more years. He’s taken 79 in seven games this season, and in this game he took 11 3’s and made six to propel NJIT to the win.
2. Nov. 22: #331 Appalachian State 65, #154 Virginia Tech 63 (8%). The top of the ACC appears to be stronger than any other conference, but the bottom of the league has some issues. At the same that the Hokies’ football team was dueling Wake Forest to a scoreless tie in regulation, App State went to Blacksburg and won on a rather, ahem, fortuitous shot by Frank Eaves.
1. Nov. 28: #300 Delaware State 72, #91 Wake Forest 65 (7%). While there’s a certain sense of anticipation that surrounds a season with a first-year coach, the fact is that it’s usually a rough year for a program under a new leader. Both these teams are experiencing that to some degree this season. But still, this is not a game Wake Forest should lose even if the players had to coach themselves. The Demon Deacons were coming off a 24-point win over Mount St. Mary’s. Delaware State was reeling from a 50-point loss to Iona. But the Hornets won in a game that wasn’t even that interesting at the end.
by Ken Pomeroy on Monday, December 1, 2014
The battle to determine which conference is the second-best in the land tips off tonight. A total of 14 games will be played in the ACC/Big Ten Challenge over the next three days. As is customary, I simulated the challenge a million times based on my ratings to determine the chances of each conference winning the event.
The last two seasons have ended in a tie and the powers-that-be have yet to adopt my tie-breaker of aggregate free throw percentage, so more ties are possible. (Kenpom.com officially recognizes the Big Ten as last season’s winner) The good news is that with more games, the chance of tie decreases.
by Ken Pomeroy on Friday, November 21, 2014
This is the weekly column where I take a look at least-likely comebacks, biggest upsets, and other extremes in the college hoops universe over the past week. There’s also a dash of Alan Williams news and other random thoughts. Just read it.
Public service message: Currently, Division-I teams are 129-0 against teams not in Division-I. These 129 games are real in the sense that they count in a team’s record, but they are not real in the sense that they mean anything. Based on the 100% winning percentage, the outcomes of the games aren’t in doubt, and even if they were, there is no evidence that the NCAA’s Men’s Basketball Committee cares about the outcome or even that they were scheduled in the first place.
For whatever reason, it is tradition to count the stats from these games in the historical record. So when Minnesota scores 109 on Franklin Pierce (Alan Alda must be crying) or Tennessee Martin holds Champion Baptist to 29, these get counted in team and individual stats just like any other game. This despite the fact that these contests are often classified as exhibitions for the opponent. Because these games are complete shams, I don’t count the stats from these games anywhere on the site. If you are looking for individual or team shooting numbers, the data on my site may not match the “official” stats that will show up in media guides and other on-line sources. But don’t let that hold you back. Let’s work together to fight the pollution of Division-I stats with these quasi-exhibition games.
Now, let’s look at the extremes from the past week according to my computer…
by Ken Pomeroy on Monday, November 17, 2014
You can’t make many sweeping judgments three days into the season, especially with so few compelling games being played. Favorites in my system have gone 168-20 so far, which is not testimony to the greatness of my preseason ratings, but that a simple preseason rating algorithm can easily predict winners with so many mismatches on the early schedule.
However, there has been one interesting development: This could be the slowest-paced season that college hoops has seen. The previous record for patience was set just two seasons ago. Of course, last season we had the sweeping crackdown on contact with the ballhandler and a block/charge interpretation that was friendlier to the offense, with an intent to reverse the trend of lower scoring in the game.
Early last season, I was stoked that coaches, fans, media, and officials had accepted this new approach in the college game. Fouls were called in bundles, pace and scoring increased significantly, and to my surprise the reaction wasn’t completely negative. We could all look forward to the day when fewer fouls were called as players adjusted to the new paradigm.
Fewer fouls were called as the season progressed, just as it happens in any season, but then came March. And the postseason tournaments were played at a pace significantly slower than the previous season. This season, the sport is picking up where it left off with what is probably the slowest-paced start to the season in the sport’s history. (We obviously don’t have data going back far to test this, but realistically, only some years in the early 80’s are possible competition.)
by Ken Pomeroy on Thursday, November 13, 2014
With the season upon us, I thought I’d take some time to summarize some of the new information available I put on the site over the summer. If you’ve paid close attention to my twitter feed, then these aren’t new. But most people don’t, so here goes.
- Conference historical summaries. If you want a clearer picture of how fast a conference has played at since 2002 or how many wins it has taken to win the league title, the conference historical summary is your place. It also provides a useful reference for membership changes. (Accessible by clicking All on the conference standings page.)
- Souped-up lineup info. If you were around at the end of last season, you saw that I posted the most frequently used lineups for each team on the team page. I’ve added some visual markup to those which depict the usage and perimeter shooting tendencies of each player.
by Ken Pomeroy on Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Who’s going to be the best three-point shooter in the land this season? If you can predict that, you can call yourself very good at predicting things although I would call you very lucky. I don’t have any special powers here, but I thought it might be fun to put together five shooters that would shoot very well this season. So well that it would be difficult to come up with another five-man team that would beat these guys.
True to my hermit-like nature, I didn’t consult a bunch of coaches or scouts to come up with this list. I used each player’s shooting numbers over the past two seasons to predict their three-point percentage this season, all from the comfort of my basement. The numbers I used were three-point, two-point, and free throws made and attempted. The three-point and free throw numbers are indicative of a player’s shooting touch. The two-point numbers probably pick up on a mix of shooting touch and size, or at least ability to get off a shot.
So did you make team? That’s a dumb question, because chances are you don’t play college basketball and you probably suck at three-point shooting. But these five guys do play and they can’t stop and won’t stop making shots.
by Ken Pomeroy on Monday, November 10, 2014
The anticipation for preseason ratings is an interesting thing. People like to talk about the projections, poke holes in them, figure out why their team is underrated. But obviously, no team is bound by the shackles of its preseason forecast. Oregon State is predicted to finish last in the Pac-12 by most robots (and humans, for that matter), but nothing is stopping the Beavers from running the table in conference play.
I guess if you want to get technical, a lack of talent might be a significant obstacle for them. But the robots will not be. If Oregon State wins its first four conference games, the robots are not going to hire Shane Stant to visit the Beavers’ locker room. In that sense, the ratings are irrelevant.
However, there is good reason to have some interest in preseason projections. For most programs, the forecasts are a reasonable estimate of what neighborhood a team will reside in this season. There were four systems that made comprehensive preseason forecasts last season. Here’s the average error in forecasting regular-season conference wins for each of them…
by Ken Pomeroy on Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Which two teams have gone the longest without losing on the same day? You might not care but regardless, I feel I have an obligation to tell you. Your indifference only motivates me to continue to track this fact with the intensity of 1000 red suns. If you’re new here, you can check out past editions of this post like the one before last season and the one that started it all in November 2012. After reading those, if you don’t care, then you may want to see a doctor and make sure your heart is functioning, because it might not be.
As it happens, the answer to this question is the same as it was last year at this time. The last time Ohio State and Kansas lost on the same day was February 19, 2005. I don’t know how rare it is for the top streak to survive a full season since this is only the third year I’ve done this, but I expect it’s rare. I can say that with confidence because the reigning pair now has nearly a two-year advantage over the next-longest streak. I can also say that with confidence because of the ten-longest streaks entering last season, just two survived. Here is that list from a year ago…
by Ken Pomeroy on Monday, November 3, 2014
With the release of the first AP poll last Friday, it’s time for a refresher on the historic value of those rankings. The preseason AP poll is not going to tell you exactly how the season will play out, but given the poll has a long track record, we can use history to tell us the chances of a team ranked in a specific position getting a particular seed in the NCAA tournament.
If you’re familiar with my work, you know by now my support for the preseason poll, and this will seem repetitive. But the data below is updated to include last season, so this is not a complete waste of your time.
Last year, two teams ranked in the preseason failed to make the tournament: #17 Marquette and #21 Notre Dame. That’s better than normal. Since the poll expanded to 25 teams in 1990, an average of 3.7 ranked teams per year have missed the field altogether. Kentucky’s appearance in the NCAA tournament kept a perfect streak alive for the preseason’s #1 team. Every #1 team has made the field since it was expanded to 64 teams in 1984-85.
by Ken Pomeroy on Tuesday, October 28, 2014
By now, you’ve noticed the preseason ratings have been posted. Thanks to all that have stopped by the past 24 hours. My server thought it was March on Sunday night. (h/t to Matt Norlander for the tweet that generated the traffic. I usually enjoy flipping the switch and watching twitter spread the word organically over the course of a few hours, but since Norlander spilled the beans approximately five minutes after the site turned over, I got an immediate firehose of traffic.)
I’ve discussed the formula in some detail in previous seasons and it hasn’t changed much in the five years I’ve been doing this. Here are some semi-random thoughts on them.